Studies was analysed using SPSS 25.0. Basic detailed analyses was did, also Cronbach’s alphas and you may frequencies. Digital logistic regressions were utilized to assess relationships anywhere between gender, many years, intimate positioning, that mejor nacionalidad latina para casarse chica have an enchanting/intimate mate, SNS utilized, sexting normalisation and you can readiness to engage in sexting just like the independent parameters, additionally the four sexting behaviors given that founded details. Nagelkerke’s R dos are thought to be a way of measuring perception size. All the details were inserted towards the design simultaneously. The study was also stratified by intercourse.
Incidence regarding sexting behaviours
The most typical sexting habits are getting (21.2%) and having through an intermediary (28.4%), with third-people forwarding away from intimate articles (nine.3%) and, finally, giving (8.1%). Descriptive statistics get in Desk 2.
The regression patterns were significant. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen dos is .42 into the “sending” design, .30 into “receiving” design, .23 with the “third-class forwarding” design, and you can .17 towards “acquiring through an intermediary” design (Table step 3:
From the “sending” design, desire to sext (OR: 8.26; 95% count on interval [CI]: 5.36-), having an intimate/intimate mate (OR: 3.44; 95% CI: dos.25-5.25), playing with Snapchat (OR: step one.87; 95% CI: step 1.19-2.93), sexual direction (OR: step 1.77; 95% CI: step one.04-step three.00) and you may age (OR: step one.36; 95% CI: step 1.step 14-step 1.63) have been somewhat associated with delivering engagement. Regarding “receiving” model, having an enchanting/intimate partner (OR: step 3.27; 95% CI: dos.51-4.28), willingness so you can sext (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: dos.01-step three.89), using Instagram (OR: step one.89; 95% CI: 1.16-step 3.10), gender (OR: step one.82; 95% CI: 1.37-2.41), having fun with Snapchat (OR: 1.61; 95% CI: step 1.21-dos.14), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.49; 95% CI: step 1.20-step one.86) and you will ages (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: step 1.step one2-step one.41) were significantly regarding getting engagement.
Regarding “third-people forwarding” design, using Instagram (OR: 2.74; 95% CI: step one.1six-6.51), desire so you’re able to sext (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: step one.48-2.72), gender (OR: step one.96; 95% CI: step 1.32-2.91), which have an enchanting/intimate mate (OR: 1.86; 95% CI: step one.29-2.68), having fun with Myspace (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: step one.03-dos.26), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.43; 95% CI: step 1.09-1.87) and you can years (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: step 1.22-step one.66) were notably associated with wedding during the third-group forwarding.
In the “receiving via an intermediary” design, playing with Instagram (OR: dos.step one6; 95% CI: step 1.47-3.19), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: step 1.52-2.24), that have a romantic/sexual lover (OR: step one.7step one; 95% CI: step one.35-2.17), sex (OR: step 1.4step 1; 95% CI: step one.step onestep 1-step 1.80) and you may ages (OR: step 1.36; 95% CI: step 1.23-1.49) was basically significantly associated with involvement when you look at the getting via a mediator.
Gender differences
The newest regression models have been significant. Nagelkerke’s R 2 was .fifty for women and you can .41 to own guys into the “sending” model; .31 for girls and you can .29 getting guys towards “receiving” model; .18 for girls and you will .twenty four having males on the “third-cluster forwarding” model; and you may .fourteen for girls and you can .twenty-two for men for the “receiving thru a mediator” design (Desk 4:
Regarding the “sending” model, for women, desire so you can sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), which have an intimate/sexual lover (OR: 4.54; 95% CI: dos.27-9.09) and you can age (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: step one.17-2.20) had been significantly connected with sending engagement. To own men, they were willingness to sext (OR: six.05; 95% CI: step three.68-9.94), with a romantic/intimate mate (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: step 1.59-cuatro.88) and utilizing Snapchat (OR: dos.38; 95% CI: 1.32-cuatro.29).
From the “receiving” model, for females, readiness to sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: dos.57-), playing with Instagram (OR: cuatro.34; 95% CI: step 1.43-), that have an enchanting/sexual lover (OR: step three.77; 95% CI: dos.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.13-dos.33) and years (OR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.17-step 1.72) was rather associated with finding wedding. To have men, they certainly were that have a romantic/sexual spouse (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: dos.08-4.25), willingness to sext (OR: dos.32; 95% CI: step 1.58-3.41), using Snapchat (OR: dos.03; 95% CI: 1.38-dos.91), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.40; 95% CI: step 1.06-1.86) and you will many years (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: step one.04-step one.38).